HomeOwners Alliance logo

Become a member today to access our home helpline, discounted conveyancing, expert advice & legal service

What estate agents have to tell you – changes to the law

The law now demands more clarity from estate agents when dealing with clients - find out what they have to disclose and demand to be kept in the know.

October 22, 2013

Sarah* had spent £800 and invested a lot of time and mental energy into buying her dream house when suddenly she had to call the whole thing off because she found out the house was subsiding.

She knew there were uncertainties involved in buying a house but hadn’t expected anyone to deliberately mislead her into buying something under false pretenses.

It turned out all three of the houses in the terrace had been underpinned and her estate agent had hidden this from her because he knew it would put her off.

Up until recently the law was not on Sarah’s side – the buyer had the responsibility of finding out if a property was faulty and if they didn’t ask, the estate agent wasn’t obliged to point out problems.

But, as of this month, the 1993 Property Misdescriptions Act (PMA) has been scrapped and estate agents now have to comply with much stricter measures under Consumer Protection from Unfair Trading Regulations (CPRs).

The law applies to estate agents, property developers and websites that introduce buyers to sellers. If any of these are deemed to be acting unfairly they can be issued limitless fines and individuals and imprisoned for up to two years.

Paula Higgins CEO of Homeowners Alliance welcomed the changes. “Although there are a lot of estate agents that act fairly we have heard too many stories in the past about ones who’ve exploited loopholes and taken advantage of their clients.

“It’s good to see the law adapting and updating itself and we hope this will result in a better deal for homebuyers and sellers,” she said.

What do these changes to the law mean for me?

CPRs mean that estate agents now have to disclose “fair” information to homebuyers and sellers. That includes making “material information” about a property clear, unambiguous and not deliberately misleading or withholding information from buyers.

It also stipulates that estate agents must be honest about their credentials, and not falsely claim that they are part of a professional body or redress scheme.

They must provide “accurate descriptions of properties they are marketing”, that means pictures of the property should be realistic – so no spending hours looking for the one angle that doesn’t show the motorway at the end of the garden.

A number of things can now be classed as withholding information from buyers. For example, not revealing planning permission or development in the area or proximity to a power station or sewage works is illegal and could result in prosecution.

The law also calls for “open, honest, clear and timely sharing of relevant information”. So no hiding information from buyers until it’s too late.

And if a number of sales have fallen through agents now have to find out why and alert the buyer.

This means situations like Sarah’s (mentioned above) will be less common because buyers are more likely to know about problems before starting the process.

Local schools, night clubs or halfway houses also have to be mentioned, as do neighbours with ASBOs and whether there have been burglaries in the area. Buyers also need to know whether there has been a murder or suicide in the property.

But the OFT warns that estate agents act for the seller, not the buyer and recommends that homebuyers contract their own solicitor or licensed surveyor to act for them. The OFT has also issued information packs on the process for both homebuyers and sellers.

However, Mark Hayward, managing director of the National Association of Estate Agents, said he had reservations about the guides. “We welcome the guidance document on compliance with Consumer Protection Regulation, but we believe that the unique and important nature of property purchase means consumers deserve further, stronger protection.

Hayward suggested when the guidance was first published that it should be used in conjunction with the now defunct 1993 Property Misdescriptions Act (PMA). “We have long advised that both pieces of legislation could exist concurrently to the benefit of the consumer,” he said.

The OFT say consumers should take control of the situation by doing their own research into the buying process, being clear with estate agents about their requirements and keeping written records of conversations about buying the property.

Buyers can now expect estate agents to investigate potential problems they think might become an issue, such as suspicions of damp or probable leaks. Although it may be hard to prove that your estate agent had a suspicion unless they specifically tell you so.

They also have to mention Green Deal loans (which allow owners to make improvements to the property and then pay them back with the savings on their electricity bill), because these debts are passed on to new owners.

Other practices that are considered unfair include putting buyers under undue pressure to skip the survey, raise their offer or exchange contracts. Estate agents should also offer their own complaints procedure.

If you think your estate agents are acting unfairly but you are not sure what to do,  then take a look at our guide on How to resolve disputes with estate agents. The guide for buyers is coming soon.

*Names have been changed.

Read more on this subject:


For tailored answers to your questions join us today and Ask an Expert or call our member’s Home HelpLine



Leave a comment

* required


  1. That’s terrible news, Mark. The estate agents should have marketed it as a 2 bed if it hasn’t got proper consents for use as a bedroom. Maybe they weren’t made aware by the vendor. There are options like indemnity insurance – see http://hoa.org.uk/services/ask-an-expert-2/ask-an-expert-i-am-selling-questions/selling-without-building-regulations/ . Without having more details, all I can advise is speak to your solicitor/conveyancer for advice. Angela

    Comment by AKerr — September 11, 2017 @ 10:17 am

  2. We were about to exchange on a so called 3 bed house which was marketed as such however it is indeed a 2 bed with loft room as there is no planning or building regs? The agents are not coming up with a solution and the vendors will not lower the cost?! I am about to be homeless as I need to be out of my house in a week? We also pulled out of another house because this one was a 3 bed? We are now out of pocket, lost a house and now potentially homeless

    Comment by Mark Price — August 30, 2017 @ 11:31 am

  3. Buying or selling my advice is never trust an estate agent.
    They often hide the truth in sneaky ways and if they get caught out they deny knowledge of the subject and claim that they were misinformed or mislead themselves. Remember, the bottom line is that an estate agent is there to make money, and not to do you any favours. In most cases things go fine and you would be better picking one that you have personal knowledge of or someone you trust has knowledge of. Remember, even the best and most well know still get it wrong as I learned to my cost.

    Comment by David — July 27, 2017 @ 8:27 am

  4. P. S.. Sorry to hijack the postings but (!) they even told us they’d had a asbestos clearance when they bought it 2 yes ago (2015). Our surveyors report states asbestos roofing to rear. He also clearly states that the house is without any doubt well over market price (even the £17k we reduced buy) due to the huge concerns. He also agrees with a survey done 8 yrs ago that the house has recent movement and coukd potentially require underpining and be ‘cash buyers only’ status…. Again!! We are so concerned that someone wilil take this house on without the full expertise of a full building structural survey. Surely the estate agebt has to let potential buyers know the information he has full details

    Comment by LC — April 14, 2017 @ 12:29 am

  5. This is so interesting to see. My first search regarding it too! Exactly same happened to us this month. We saw property online. House looked great. Substantial property. Images beautiful via online estate agents. We requested extra pics for rear of property and garden. But rest house looked stunning. These showed a very neglected area. We travelled 400 miles in the day to view. Huge surprise walking in. House woefully different to online photos. We could see huge potential though and put in a £20k reduction offer. £17k was accepted. Buyers showed us varying aspects of paperwork supporting soundness of house. We spoke about cracks/ing.. Felt reassured. Enlisted an excellent structural survey. £840! Plus £160 mining search. Survey back this wk. Huge huge issues!! We withdrew offer. Kept buyers in loop all times. Then our final reasons giving sympathetic advice we’d received that active movement shoukd be monitored for 6-12 months, areas of structural damage, and weaknesses recorded by surveyor. We had no responding message back but same day, and after WE’D TOLD the dealing local agent, it’s back on market this week for same price and no amendments to blurb. It’s a mugs game. £1000 lost for us. And potential naive buyer could be buying a pup. Surely it needs to be clear and a fair overview of a concerning house?

    Comment by LC — April 14, 2017 @ 12:20 am

  6. Buying a property but just discovered it’s of Non Standard Consruction,
    Should the agent have informed me before I got a surveyor in

    Comment by Gail Smith — April 26, 2016 @ 6:53 pm

  7. Not sure you can help me on this one I’m bidding for a house I understand the agents can’t tell me what the highest bid is.but could he someone had bid higher than me to get more money from me

    Comment by Carol Brocklebank — March 14, 2016 @ 8:03 pm

  8. Not sure if you can help me on this one .im bidding on a house .i understand the agents can’t tell me what the highest bid is .but what I would like to know if I bid the highest amount .would he say someone had bid higher just to get more money from me

    Comment by Carol Brocklebank — March 14, 2016 @ 7:54 pm

  9. Do estate agents have to give my name to the seller

    Comment by Nudge — March 1, 2016 @ 2:18 am

  10. I was purchasing a property, had survey done, solicitor did searches and found there had been subsidence done on the property 20 years ago. The vendors, family member of deceased person and solicitor claim they did not know this about the property. Paperwork could not be found and then surprise, paperwork was found. This was not informative, more receipt like, no confirmation of where or how much subsidence had been done. I withdrew my offer. Subsequently, the property is back on the market and no mention of subsidence in the particulars on line. Somebody has phoned up and was not informed of
    The subsidence. Are the estate agents acting unlawfully?

    Comment by Sue cook — November 18, 2014 @ 7:54 am

  11. Should the particulars of a property state that a property is Grade II listed if it is and also if it is in a conservation area?

    Comment by Shelley Aitkenhead — July 25, 2014 @ 2:42 pm

Become a member today

Become a member of the HomeOwners Alliance:


✓ To Ask an Expert
✓ Access our Home Helpline
✓ Free Legal Advice Line
✓ Fee free mortgage advice
✓ Discounted conveyancing
✓ Unbiased advice

Join today >

Ask an expert

Get advice from industry experts on your homeownership issues

Members of the HomeOwners Alliance can send in their questions and we will find an expert to give you a tailored answer, using their industry-insider experience

Ask an expert >

Don't Miss Out!

Sign up to our free newsletter for latest advice, services and money saving offers

Sign Up Image