HomeOwners Alliance logo

Sign up to our newsletter for the latest property news, tips & money saving offers

  • Looking to buy a new home? Start here

Farmer builds castle behind hay bales to avoid planning permission

An ambitious farmer from Surrey illegally built a mock Tudor castle and managed to hide it for years behind a wall of hay bales. Now, he faces an injunction ordering it's demolition...


Robert Fidler castle

Robert Fidler, 66, hid his new build property from the council for years behind a giant wall of hay bales. He argued that he only built the property secretly in 2000 because planning authorities in Surrey failed to acknowledge an application to convert an existing property for nine years.

Now, however, Mr Fidler has been given an injunction ordering its demolition.

But the farmer is fighting back; claiming that an ecological survey conducted in June this year had established the presence of bats and newts around the property.

In Britain, all bat species and their roosts are legally protected.  Mr Fidler said that he would be breaking European laws if he demolished the house as required by a court order without establishing the possible impact on “roosting” bats at the property.

To add to the confusion, Mr Fidler also said that he was no longer the owner of the property, having sold it to a buyer earlier this year who allowed him to stay in the house – though he now faces eviction.

Honeycrock Farm concealed behind hay bales


Mr Fidler hoped that by concealing the house at Honeycrock Farm in Salfords, he could exploit a loophole that meant if a construction was uncontested for four years authorities could not touch it.

The farmer and his family moved into the castle in 2002, but it was later discovered by Reigate and Banstead Borough Council who ordered its demolition in 2007.

The council, which had to take Mr Fidler to court after he refused to comply with court orders and an injunction ordering him to knock it down, said the case has cost it £50,000.

On the claimed discovery of the bats, Mr Fidler argued his dilemma. He said, “I understand from the website [] that if there were any endangered species threatened by actions of either demolishing the building or the garden wall, that it was a very serious offence.”

He claims to have written to the council but said they have failed to respond.

He accused the council of having ‘no interest at all in their responsibilities to wildlife’.

“They did absolutely nothing, even when I told them I had found the problem. What is more serious, is that whether they acknowledged this survey would take weeks or months, they still applied to this court to put me in prison for not doing something they clearly knew they could not do themselves.’

“This is something I can only described as blackmail, saying ‘you will go to prison unless you comply with this criminal act. I have got a choice. I either go to prison if I do knock it down, or I go to prison if I don’t.”

Today, Mr Fidler has been given three-month jail sentence for contempt of court, suspended pending compliance with demolition order by next June.

Thinking of building a castle? Or perhaps just an extension… Find out if you need planning permission here! >>>


Notify of
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Starting a home improvement project?



Use a RIBA Buildings Contract with your builder to:

✓ Stay in control of your project

✓ Agree scope of work

✓ Set completion dates

✓ Have clear payment schedules

✓ Reduce the risks to your project


Read more >

Share this page:

close popup ×

Before   you go...

If you found this website useful, could you spare a minute to leave us a review?